For operators of steel processes, pipelines and port terminals where a local control change can carry consequences through a wider chain.
Close remote access and change paths around operational PLCs.
Define whether a validated signal should create a process-specific safe state.
Use an isolated representative copy to investigate without experimenting on the line.
PILLAR 1 · PROTECT
When access and changes reach operational PLCs
AX-Box Gatekeeper adds local access, communication and change controls around supported operational PLCs without modifying the PLC.
P1 approach for supported PLCs; controller and protocol fit are validated per installation.
PILLAR 2 · CONTROL SAFETY
When a cyber signal may create process risk
AX-Interlock provides a predefined control-safety path following a cyber signal. The integration is lab-tested; operational validation and certification scope are not yet complete and remain open per environment.
Standalone P2 approach: aXite software is required; AX-Box Gatekeeper hardware is optional. Operators, integrators and OEMs agree the implementation scope.
PILLAR 3 · RESILIENCE
When attack paths need evidence away from live production
AX-Cyberrange provides an isolated representative OT/process copy to investigate executable attacks, process effects and defences without experimenting in live production.
Model fidelity, system support and test scope are agreed per environment. Independent of Protect and Control Safety; no P1 or P2 prerequisite.
AX-Box Gatekeeper has been in operation in Schiphol airport baggage systems since 2017.
See all proof →Choose the question first: protection around the asset, a defined response, or isolated validation away from production.
Discuss the installation →